![]() |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA Monday, February 3,
2003 9:00 A.M.
Worksession AGENDA 1.
Citizen Comments—Marion Lambert Ms. Marion Lambert has requested time on the agenda to speak
to the Commissioners regarding child support issues. 2. Criminal Justice Resource Center
Recidivism Report The Honorable Craig B. Brown, District Court Judge
and Chairperson of the Durham Criminal Justice Partnership Advisory Board, has
requested time on the agenda to present a summary of the latest recidivism
study conducted by the Criminal Justice Resource Center. Annually, the staff of the Criminal Justice
Resource Center reviews re-arrest data of offenders attending community-based
corrections programs at the Center. Resource
Person(s): Gudrun Parmer, Director, Criminal Justice
Resource Center. County Manager’s Recommendation: The County
Manager recommends that the Board receive the report. 3. Report by the Transportation Demand
Management Multi-Jurisdictional Advisory Board The
Commute Trip Reduction Program Ordinance, enacted in February 2000, created the
Multi-Jurisdictional Advisory Board.
Section 24-120 of the Ordinance states that the purpose of this Board is
to provide guidance to the Lead Agency and the Triangle Transit Authority in implementing
and managing the Congestion Management Program. The Advisory Board shall further provide information on
congestion management to the County Manager and the Board of County
Commissioners, and shall make recommendations to Commissioners as to the
performance of the Lead Agency. The
Advisory Board is composed of eight members: four appointed by the City of
Durham and four members appointed by Durham County. The Board meets on the fourth Thursday of the first month of each
quarter (January, April, July, and October). The Ordinance requires that this Advisory Board make an
annual report to the Board of County Commissioners. The Chair of this Advisory Board will make a brief presentation
on the current status of the Transportation Demand Management efforts in Durham
County, including some recommendations for enhancing the Commute Trip Reduction
Program. Resource
Person(s): Richard “Dick" Sloane, Chair of the
Multi-Jurisdictional Advisory Board County
Manager’s Recommendation: The County Manager recommends that the
Board receive the report. 4.
Resource Conservation and Development (RC&D) Council The Durham Soil and Water
Conservation District request that the BOCC allow a 15-minute presentation on
the County becoming a member of a Resource Conservation and Development
(RC&D) Council. The purpose of the
RC&D program is to accelerate the conservation, development, and
utilization of natural resources, improve the general level of economic
activity, and to enhance the environment and standard of living in designated
RC&D areas. RC&D projects
relate to: land conservation, water management, economic development, and
community sustainability. By
participating, Durham County would benefit from grant money to carry out
community projects. For example, the December ice storm caused huge amounts of
debris from trees. This program could have assisted the County in removing the
debris, mulching it, and selling the by-product. Other examples could be
clearing and the restoration of streams, installing dry hydrants for getting
the County a class 5A insurance rating, and collecting and utilizing the
methane gas from the landfill. There
are presently ten RC&D Councils established in North Carolina. If agreed upon, Durham, along with Franklin,
Granville, Johnston, Wake and Wilson would form the eleventh council in the
state. Resource
Person(s): Talmage Layton, Associate Supervisor, Durham SWCD; Stan
Steury, RC&D Coordinator, Blue Ridge Council; Eddie Culberson, Director of
Soil and Water County
Manager’s Recommendation: The County
Manager recommends that the Board receive the presentation and advise staff as
to whether the County is interested in adopting a resolution to become a member
of the RC&D Council. 5.
2003 General Bond Referendum for Durham Public Schools The Board will get its first look at
major revisions to the Capital Improvement Program during the March 3, 2003
Worksession. It is anticipated that
more than $600 million in projects will be included in the first major revision
to the ten-year plan since it was adopted in August of 2001. Over thirty-five
percent (35%), approximately $225 million, of the recommended expenditures are
for the Durham Public Schools. The
school system is also updating its facilities plan, the initial draft of which
will be presented to the Board of Education on February 4, 2003. The County Manager has requested that
Superintendent Ann Denlinger recommend a list of projects for the Board of
Education to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners in the amount of
$100 million. After the Board of
Education has developed its priorities for funding and the Board of County
Commissioners has decided on the amount of bond funds that it desires to issue
to finance the improvements, voters will be asked in November to approve the issuance
of general obligation bonds for the selected projects. It should be noted that the November
2003 referendum would combine Resource
Person(s): Mike Ruffin, County Manager; Chuck Kitchen, County
Attorney; Pam Meyer, Budget and Management Services Director County
Manager's Recommendation: Receive the
presentation and advise staff, if additional information is desired, prior to
the formal presentation during the March 3, 2003 Worksession. 6.
Briefing of The Emergency Response During the December 2002 Ice Storm Staff
will provide the Durham County Board of Commissioners with a summary of the
staff debriefing, which occurred as a result of the ice storm that affected
Durham County in December of 2002. Resource
Person(s): Carolyn P. Titus, Deputy County Manager; Jeffrey
Batten, County Fire Marshal/Director of Emergency Management County
Manager’s Recommendation: The County Manager recommends that the
Board receive the briefing and provide staff with any feedback or direction. 7.
Rules of Procedure for the Durham County Board of Commissioners Proposed
revisions to the Rules of Procedure for the Board of Commissioners are
attached. The revisions reflect the
practice which has been adopted since the last revision to the rules regarding
public comment, deadlines for submission of agenda items, and several clerical
corrections. Resource
Person(s): Chuck Kitchen, County Attorney County
Manager’s Recommendation: Review the proposed changes to the Rules
of Procedure and make any changes desired.
The item will then be moved to the consent agenda for the regular Board
meeting on February 10, 2003 for approval. |
|